Viral Professional Development in High Schools
This morning I had an ‘a-ha’ moment while talking to a math teacher at the school. He came with me to TLt last week to present about the school’s online learning courses. While there, he had a chance to talk to Dan Schellenberg. Dan had some questions about teaching calculus online, and Bruce had some questions about Dan’s online math resources.Bruce and I had a lengthy discussion that started with interactive whiteboards but ended up with some of the tools he might use so he could find, put or link to resources online. We talked about the uses of blogs, wikis, social bookmarking and RSS aggregation. We did not spend too much time talking about the technologies but their uses. After our conversation, I did a little happy dance. A few thoughts occurred to me and I thought it would be a good idea to share them (inspired by Dean, and I wanted them articulated/written out before I forget them).
- The best way, maybe the only way at my school, to motivate teachers to try something new is to let them see or talk to what another subject specialist teacher is doing. The math teachers don’t want to hear from me – they need to see or hear from other math teachers. My job is to make the connection to those who are leading the way.
- In a large, heterogeneous group of teachers/instructors, viral professional development is the only
way to go. The PD needs to be one-to-one between the teacher and the
educational technologist. There are too many tools to keep track of and
too many use cases for the instructors to keep track of. That’s my job. Jen has written much more articulately than I could about viral professional development. Go read what she has written. - There was a dynamic theme at TLt – “It’s about the technology” and “It’s not about the technology“. Both are right – it is a dessert topping and a floor wax! When we’re talking about educational objectives and what teachers want students to learn, it’s not about the technology. When we’re talking about the process of reaching those objectives, it most definitely is about the technology. If I want to build a house, I need to select the right tools for the right job. Saws are used to cut wood, hammer and nails to join wood together. The process is not entirely linear since available technology defines or limits what can be done with it.
Loading...
We are so quick to implement PD in the same standard format in any institution…introduce a concept, lecture, show examples (great powerpoint!), and pat ourselves on the back for some small group interaction. Wake up and smell the evaluation forms! OUT OF CONTEXT, OUT OF MIND! Only later as we begin to work through new materials or processes that enhance our practice do we long for those peers to network with! Who has not been on the phone with subject/grade alike teachers from other schools asking for input or advice (especially for us, the small schools!)? I agree with you Rob. On the phone=saw… Encourage a network with today’s social tools= table saw!
VPD makes sense and addresses that most difficult of all concepts….change. It is that unrealistic need for immediacy that drives PD back to the lecturing large groups.
However, I would argue that admin needs to understand VPD and it’s relation to effective change and the need for time, otherwise we might find that bandsaw has lost it’s cord.
Shaun Loeppky - 2008/05/27 at 21:49
Really interested to see your thoughts here. Two things you might like to consider:
1) “It’s the teach, not the tech” that makes the real difference! Ewan Macintosh has long espoused the difference, and I can but agree…
2) You should consider trying the TeachMeet model for CPD. It’s very viral, great fun, and it works! Find out more at the TeachMeet wiki!
Cheers from Scotland!
Mr W - 2009/10/09 at 05:51